By Martha Martin
Minister of Education and Care
St. Andrew's United Church, Halifax
“Belonging” The Social Network
I’m happy to offer the second sermon in our Wiki-Bible
series. For those who weren’t hear last week, Russ
introduced the 9 week series by explaining that what we
hope to do is to examine “…some of the texts
that people turn to when they seek spiritual meaning, or
moral clarity, or deep healing. So, ‘Wiki-Bible’
is not so much a collection of texts as a cultural crossroads
at which people find and share the stories that shape their
lives – whether they appear in books, movies, plays,
music, and so on.”
Our hope is that the discussion moves out past Sunday morning.
The sermons will be on our website, along with a blog. That
part of the website is now up and running, and we hope that
many of you will enter the online discussion, and also make
suggestions for the next 7 weeks in the series.
Today, I’m going to talk about the 2010 movie The
Social Network, and hopefully help us reflect on some of
the themes that I found in the movie. Don’t worry
if you haven’t seen the movie – it’s not
a prerequisite, and I’ll explain what you need to
know. If you haven’t seen it, maybe you’ll be
inspired to go out and rent it on DVD – it was just
released this past week. It is on just about everyone’s
“Top 10 movies of 2010 list”, and many rank
it as the best movie of 2010.
It’s a great movie – visually fun to watch,
with fast paced dialogue written by Aaron Sorkin, who was
responsible for the TV series The West Wing.
In one review I read about this movie, the reviewer says:
“The Social Network is to the 2000s what Casablanca
was to the 1940s, Rebel Without a Cause was to the 1950s,
and Wall Street was to the 1980s. It is a film that tells
a specific story while defining the very context of the
age in which it sits. … Just as Casablanca challenged
viewers to choose a side in World War II and Wall Street
opened our eyes to the excess of lavish 80s lifestyles and
unchecked greed, The Social Network warns us about the incredible
responsibility of being instantly globally connected –
all the while re-discovering the real meaning of our relationships
in life.”
The tagline for the movie is “You don’t get
to 500 million friends without making a few enemies”.
The movie tells the story of Mark Zuckerberg, the young
genius behind the website Facebook, and the people he, whether
unwittingly or not, stepped on along the way to becoming
the world’s youngest billionaire.
But let me just pause for a minute – I suspect there
might be at least some of you who feel lost already …
so let’s briefly take a step back … what is
the social network? The social network is a way of communicating
on the Internet where all users can be active participants
in the conversations. It allows people to produce and share
content directly with other users to share the information
and resources they need. It allows and encourages open access
for individuals to share thoughts, opinions, and feelings.
Just for fun, I’m going to show you a two minute clip
that was circulating on youtube and Facebook at Christmastime
– someone has imagined how the nativity story might
be told through social media.
Show two minute clip, The Digital Nativity
I hope that gives you a bit of an idea of what social media
is, and the social network. Did you see the range of elements
– email messages, google maps, Wikipedia, twitter,
youtube, sharing pictures and videos, online shopping, and,
of course Facebook … all together, it’s a way
of communicating, it’s a way of getting and sharing
information … and, especially with Facebook, it’s
a way of belonging.
Jean Vanier is the founder of the international movement
of L’Arche communities, where people who have developmental
disabilities create homes together with the friends who
assist them. Born in 1928, he is the son of Governor General
Georges Vanier and Pauline Vanier. Jean Vanier has become
a leader in consciousness-raising about the plight of all
who are marginalized, and is internationally recognized
as a social and spiritual leader. He is the author of the
best selling book Becoming Human, based on the 1998 Massey
Lectures, and Finding Peace, written in 2003. MacLean’s
Magazine has called him “a Canadian who inspires the
world”. Today, there are more than 120 L’Arche
communities on five continents.
When Canadian filmmaker Karen Pascal traveled to France
to meet Jean Vanier, she planned to make a film about him,
but he wanted to make a film about what he said is the most
important issue facing humanity today in our post 9/11 world
– belonging.
In the film, which comes with a discussion and study guide,
we see Vanier point out the tension between human beings’
inherent need for an identity and a place to belong, and
the extreme end of that continuum where that need to belong
engenders exclusivity, and what I sometimes call “circling
the wagons.” Vanier’s lifelong work has been
about creating communities where everyone belongs, and where
everyone is honoured and celebrated. The circle always has
an opening. It is never closed.
As Vanier suggests, this need to belong isn’t new.
It’s in our DNA. The methods of today might be new,
but the need to belong has always been there. In the movie
The Social Network, we are led to believe that the creation
of Facebook was a response on Mark Zukerberg’s part
to not being “punched” for Harvard’s “final
clubs.” There is a suggestion in the film that the
demise of his friendship with Eduardo, his best friend,
and co-founder of Facebook, began when Eduardo did get asked
to try out for one of the final clubs. Whether that’s
true or not has been a subject for much debate.
Here’s a bit of background from Wikipedia, because
I didn’t know all this - the historical basis for
the name final club is that Harvard used to have a variety
of clubs for students of different years being in different
clubs, and the "final clubs" were so named because
they were the last social club a person could join before
graduation.
Each fall the clubs hold "punch season," which
is similar to the rush period for fraternities. Sophomores
and juniors are invited to a series of social events. After
each event, more likely prospective members, or "punches",
are invited back. After the last event, called a "final
dinner", each club elects 10-30 new members who then
choose among the clubs they have been asked to join. Being
"punched" refers to receiving an invitation to
the first punch event. As you might imagine, there has been
much controversy and debate about this process and its exclusive
nature over the years.
Here’s a clip from the movie where Mark is pitching
his Facebook idea to Eduardo …
The Social Network clip – Outside
Did you hear what Mark Zukerberg said? “it’s
taking the whole social experience of college and putting
it online”, and then Eduardo says “it would
be exclusive”; then Mark says “people would
have to know the people on the site to get past your own
page – it’s like getting punched, it’s
like a final club with a president.”
As I said earlier, whether or not there is a lot of truth,
or some truth, or no truth in the movie has been a subject
of much debate this past year. Zuckerberg has denied much
of the narrative of the movie, but the fact is is that there
were settlements of substantial amounts of money from Zuckerberg
to both Eduardo, who was eventually frozen out of the company,
and the two other young Harvard men who claimed that Zuckerberg
stole their idea for Facebook.
For me, I think the movie raises questions of the quality
of our relationships – it’s possible to have
hundreds, if not thousands of “friends” on Facebook.
It may be a wonderful tool, but are we still able to practice
compassion, concern, and inclusivity in that environment?
Our gospel lesson today recalls the beginning of Jesus’
ministry. In John’s gospel, we hear about Jesus’
baptism from John the Baptist’s perspective, looking
back. He says “I didn’t know who he was …
I was there and saw the Spirit come down on him like a dove
from heaven. And the Spirit stayed on him.” Then we
hear that the next day, John saw Jesus again and said to
his own followers “There he is again …”
after which John’s followers began to follow Jesus.
Jesus asks them “what do you want?”, or some
translations say “what are you looking for? …”
and the disciples reply “Teacher, where do you live?”,
which I think is a kind of funny first question to ask someone
when you are just meeting them.
To which Jesus replies “Come and see.” Come
and see. What a wonderful answer - or, really, a non-answer.
Perhaps this is the equivalent of the Facebook “friend
request.” On Facebook, you can only get access to
another person’s story and information after they
ask you to be their friend. That’s the way Mark Zuckerberg
and Eduardo Saverin designed it, and it still holds. It’s
exclusive that way. And when you press that “confirm
request” button, are you really saying “come
and see?” It can either turn out to be a superficial
relationship, or it might be the beginning of something
deeper.
I wonder if it is that much different in our gospel story.
John introduced his disciples to Jesus. Andrew in turn introduced
his brother Peter to Jesus. And then the disciples spoke
to others, and they told others … and then Paul travelled
the Mediterranean world and introduced countless others
to the Jesus movement … and in several hundred years
there was a worldwide movement. Same process, just took
a little longer than Facebook.
Those of us who know the story of Jesus know that Andrew
and Peter, and many other followers, began a journey that
would change their lives, and the life of the world. But
the first invitation was the friend request, “Come
and see.” If you read the gospel story in one fail
swoop, from beginning to end, you find that despite their
best intentions, those poor disciples never got it right.
The disciples thought that they were being invited into
an elite club, with Jesus as its president. The club of
the Kingdom of God. But whenever they thought they had it
all figured out, whenever they began to close the circle
of their community, Jesus did something surprising –
he ate dinner with someone who he wasn’t supposed
to, he healed someone he wasn’t supposed to, he welcomed
women and children into the mix, he welcomed people into
the community that he wasn’t supposed to … like
Jean Vanier two thousand years later, he challenged the
people of his day to create communities where everyone belonged
and where everyone was honoured and celebrated.
Now, I’m not saying that can’t happen on Facebook.
I love Facebook – I’m on every day … I
learn a lot, about my friends, and about the world. It allows
me to keep up with people that I sometimes only see once
a year, if that. I have reconnected with cousins on the
other side of the country that I have spoken to in years.
But Facebook doesn’t replace this face to face community.
It doesn’t replace the 15-20 university students that
gather every Tuesday evening in the Mary Holmes room for
dinner, or the folks that come in right after them for the
First Light study … or the many groups that meet in
this building every week. It’s not either/or …
it’s both/and. Thanks be to God.
http://www.standrewshfx.ca/blog/
Paul Jarzembowski, Spiritual Popcorn; http://spiritualpopcorn.glogspot.com/20010/10social-network.html
Living the Faith, The Journal, p.47; The United Church of
Canada, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkHNNPM7pJA
belonging, the Search for Acceptance; study guide, p.2-3
Wikipedia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtxyfQtZlKQ
|